Sunday, June 7, 2009

A Disaster of Allenesque Proportion

Just a couple years after Leslie Gore’s “It’s My Party” peaked on the charts, Irwin Allen introduced a TV show called “The Time Tunnel.” Its premise was that two scientists (one played by former teen idol James Darren) were stuck in a time travel experiment gone wrong. They would get zapped to an earlier age, find themselves in the midst of some historical event, and for the next 48 minutes they would battle evil in its various guises, from murderous cavemen to Hitler Youth. Inevitably captured, just as they were to be dispatched, their colleagues back at the lab would find their coordinates and attempt to bring them back. Of course, they could never quite get them back to the 60s, and so we would see them arrive in some precarious situation in another age, and in true cliffhanger fashion, we would have to wait a week to find out how they would escape.

Allen was known for his sensationalistic movies and television programs, but while they were lowbrow, they were also incredibly popular. If you look at his body of work, you see that while he started off producing adaptations of works by such respected authors as Arthur Conan Doyle and H.G. Wells, his projects became increasingly sensationalistic, and required less and less of the viewer.

Allen went from “The Lost World” to “Time Tunnel” and eventually to such campy enterprises as “Lost in Space” and “Land of the Giants.” While the technological improvements in the production of TV shows was growing almost exponentially, his programming endeavored to shoot for the lowest common denominator, and once it latched onto that audience, proceeded to drag them down even more.

If we track the music video industry and its portrayal of women, it follows an eerily similar arc. Leslie Gore and her contemporaries were the very picture of innocence and even purity. As the sexual revolution of the late 60s and 70s took root, however, the way women were portrayed changed significantly, first in the movies, and eventually on TV and especially in music videos.

At the same time that the sexual revolution was in full swing (wow, that was an awful pun – sorry), the women’s movement was also making major inroads. Traditional gender roles were being called into question, and people, especially those who were mainstream and over 30, were left with a lot of questions. Rather than risk alienating its audience, Hollywood simply stopped making as many movies featuring strong women characters, and instead reverted back to the days of the Westerns when women were either whores or one-dimensional women of virtue. Even Hollywood’s biggest stars took roles as prostitutes (e.g., Jane Fonda in Klute). There were very few good comedy roles for them because most people just weren’t laughing yet about the struggle between the sexes.

Meanwhile, music videos were born as a way for the record companies to promote their acts, usually shown at clubs and concerts between the live acts. Then in 1981, MTV blazed onto the scene, just as cable TV was starting to penetrate more and more households. At first, most videos on MTV were simple performance videos or stylized acting out of the lyrics, but within the first year, a few rock bands realized this was a new way to reach the most active record buyers – teenage boys. To get and keep their attention, most bands started featuring women in their videos, and the race to the bottom was off to a roaring start.

Van Halen’s “Hot for Teacher” and the J. Geils Band’s “Angel is a Centerfold” were two of the best examples. Soon, however, the gyrating, semi-clad women in the videos were not even central to the “story” of the song, but were simply eye candy for the viewers.

When rap and hip-hop became more popular, the artists started taking it to extremes. The women were reduced to booty-shaking accessories for the men in the videos. The all-time low may have been reached in Nelly’s video for the song “Tip Drill” when a woman is completely objectified, even to the point of having a man swipe his credit card down her butt crack.

So if this is what the men are doing in music videos, what about the women? Unfortunately, the expectations are that women will go along with this teenage boy fantasy, even if the record buyers are predominantly female. Early on, Madonna’s fans were overwhelmingly female, yet she displayed her body in a way that not only appealed to males, but also sent the message to her young female fans that their bodies were their number one asset, and they had better learn how to use them.

This has persisted to today. Britney Spears’ latest single, “If You Seek Amy,” is a thinly veiled come-on, and shows her as a woman on the hunt for sex. Obviously, L’il Kim’s work is meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator, as well.

Even artists who previously eschewed such techniques are now laying on the makeup, putting on the push-up bras and slutting it up for their videos. If Leslie Gore fell into the Time Tunnel, she wouldn’t believe where we’ve ended up now.

7 comments:

  1. Joe,

    Not only do I appreciate your solid name, but your solid understanding of the progression (or de-evolution shall we say) of popular music. I felt like I learned more from your posting than from the Wikipedia page! I agree on the Nelly video, that is the "all-time low" - I almost vomited when I saw that.

    - Joe

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had never seen the Nelly video until now. I searched for it and the video is crazy. I remember people up in arms about 2Live Crew's Me So Horny.
    The connections you draw to the teenage boy as a consumer are very true. There was a Frontline story a few years called the Merchants of Cool. In it they describe two segments of teen marketing, the Mook and the Midriff. The Mook is the stereotypical loud, crude adolescent male and the Midriff is the adolescent girl wanting to be strong, sexual creature.
    Another note, how does Quantum Leap compare to Time Tunnel?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Joe,

    From reading other blogs and even my own posting, these videos were looked upon from the female perspective but you decided to look at it from the teenage boy point of view. I am interested to know why? Also I am interested to see your take on how the evolution of music videos an their objectification have effected guy and girl relationships. Good Post, way to think outside of the box!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Joe,

    What an interesting blog post! You seem to have a great understanding of the progression of music videos... I learned a lot from you! My question (like the above post), is why are these videos marketed to the teenage boy? What about the teenage girl? And while traditionally, some bands have been marketed towards women, why do they tend to be so much less crude? I'm thinking my own generation here, with bands singing songs like "God Must Have Spent A Little More Time On You" (harmless) or Hanson... why are they so underrepresented number wise versus the songs you mention marketed to boys (Nelly, most rap, even Lil Kim is most certainly marketed to a male audience).

    My second question for you is where do you see this progression going? Is it time the pendulum swung the other way? How much more of the If You Seek Amy can the general public take before the general trend is to move not entirely, but in the direction of Leslie Gore? Do you see that happening?

    Again, excellent post and very entertaining!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, guys.

    Thanks for your thoughtful comments and questions on my post. I will try to answer all your questions in one fell swoop, but no particular order.

    1)"Quantum Leap" was a thinly veiled reworking of "Time Tunnel," but with a couple twists. For one, Scott Bakula's character moved through time, but only his within lifetime. Another was that when he "leapt," it was into another person's body. Finally, the buddy aspect featured Dean Stockwell (whom I have loved since "Blue Velvet") as the holographic connection back to reality.

    2) As for "The Merchants of Cool," I nailed my first teaching job interview by confessing to having been one, and that teaching students to be media savvy is my penance.

    3)Why did I consider the videos from the perspective of a teenage boy and not a girl? Well, I used to be one, and (according to my wife)in too many ways I still am. Also, boys purchase and download more music and videos than girls. When it comes to music, boys are influenced by each others' opinions, whereas girls are more influenced by what they hear on the radio. Finally, girls are more tolerant of the ways women are portrayed in videos than boys are of the "harmless" Hansonesque pop.

    4) How have these videos affected relationships? Poorly. Lots of guys have grown up being constantly exposed to these images and are inured to them. Their girlfriends are then confronted with a boy who has not learned how to properly regard and treat a woman. Girls with low self-esteem are sometimes more apt to put up with this, and some even embrace it by adopting the stripper-chic attitude. Sad.

    5) Where is all going? No one knows. There could be a pendulum swing back to more traditional ways of presenting women, but with the music industry on the ropes, I think the leadership of those companies are willing to do whatever it takes to survive, even if it means more of the same misogynistic drivel.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just watched "Tip Drill". I don't know what to say. And the critique on "Criminal" said Apple's video was soft porn? Ha! I'd like to see the she'd say about this video. I had never seen that video before, it was really eye opening as to how far the objectification of women has gone. I mean what did I just watch? And I can't believe there were so many women seemingly willing to be in the video. All I saw in the video was male domination. I mean all the men where clothed...I mean CLOTHED head to toe. And the women, well barely had bathing suits on. But it wasn't just the clothing, it was the way the women's bodies were being treated. This really scares and disturbs me. I wonder what viewers of this will think and what image they form in their mind when seeing this without a critical eye. I really can't imagine how it can get much lower than that.

    Great post by the way. You have great insight into this issue - very eye opening.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Joe,
    I was actually going to reference Tip-Drill in a response I wrote to another post. I would agree that it crossed the line even for people who enjoy watching videos like LIl Kim's. I think it only plays well after midnight on MTV or BET's "un-cut" video series. (I hate that I know that, if indeed that is the case). At any rate that is the danger with continuing to push the envelope. Soon videos like that may play at 4pm for all of the after school kids. Horrible. At the same time though, I think it is important for viewers of this video not to take it as an example of what hip hop music or hip hop videos are at their core. This should not be an example of this genre, but an example of porn being depicted through music. This is in a category of its own. Although there are unfortunately many videos of this nature that all come on "un-cut".

    ReplyDelete